Flash

TopicOpenAI safety team changes

Flash·Safety & Risk·2026-10-10 02:06

OpenAI Fires Three Safety Researchers, Citing Sensitive-Information Policy Violations

OpenAI dismissed three safety researchers last week after an internal investigation found they had violated policies on handling sensitive information, the company confirmed in a post on X on Friday. The trio responded with a public letter, saying they were fired for "prioritizing safety over the near-term interests of OpenAI as a corporation."

Bright modern tech-company office hallway with glass walls and people in conversation
OpenAI and the three dismissed safety researchers offer two conflicting accounts: a policy breach, or retaliation for speaking up on safety?

What happened

The Wall Street Journal first reported that OpenAI dismissed safety researchers Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni last week. On Friday, the company said on X that its internal investigation had uncovered "a significant breach of trust beyond what's outlined in the letter they published," stood by the decision, and stressed that it has "not and do[es] not terminate any of our employees for raising concerns."

The trio, in a letter to company leadership, said the handling of their dismissals has made former colleagues "afraid to speak" — the very culture that once made OpenAI's safety work possible. Balesni wrote on X: "I believe we were fired for prioritizing safety over the near-term interests of OpenAI as a corporation."

Key facts

  1. The three researchers:Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni, all working on AI safety.
  2. The company's account:violations of sensitive-information handling policies and "a significant breach of trust"; unrelated to raising safety concerns.
  3. The trio's account:they were not the source of last month's The Information report on security concerns around OpenAI's new Astra model; Wang said she was fired over an executive's email access granted for recruiting purposes, which she had repeatedly asked to have revoked.
  4. Coverage:The Wall Street Journal broke the story of the firings and the letter; Reuters, AP, and CNN followed the same day.

Context

The dispute comes as current and former researchers at frontier labs — OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic — warn publicly that companies are doing too little to guard against self-improving AI systems that could become difficult for humans to control.

Why it matters

All three dismissed are safety researchers; the company cites breaches of sensitive-information policy and denies any link to safety concerns, while the three say they were fired for putting safety ahead of the company's near-term interests.
Useful Tap if this story helped you

SourcesReuters (2026-10-09, source); CNN (2026-10-08, source); AP (2026-10-09, source). This article is a compilation of public information and does not constitute investment advice.

From HIMIAO Horizon · himiao.ai

Comments

  1. Loading comments…

Related

  1. Oct 4Former OpenAI Safety Staffer Explains Resignation: "The Time for Trial and Error Is Over"
  2. Oct 15US FTC Issues Civil Subpoenas to OpenAI and Anthropic: AI Safety Probe Escalates
  3. Oct 14UK Parliament AI Safety Hearing: OpenAI and Anthropic Call for Binding Rules as Google and Meta Decline
  4. Oct 13OpenAI and Anthropic Urge Binding AI Safety Rules at UK Parliament Hearing
  5. Oct 13FBI Arrests Former OpenAI Employee Over Hidden Office Listening Device

Today

Oct 19 Monday

Latest news

All →
  1. Oct 18Anthropic to Commit 5% of Shares to New Public Benefit Fund
  2. Oct 19Stably AI's Orca Tops GitHub Daily Trending: One Desktop App to Orchestrate 30+ Coding Agents
  3. Oct 19Jailbroken PS5 Becomes a Local AI Server: Qwen3.8-27B Hits ~20 tok/s, Small Models Top 100
  4. Oct 19Anthropic Internal Study: Junior Share of Technical Staff Falls to 14%, Meeting Time Up 20%
  5. Oct 18Claude Cracks 25-Year Cryptography Mystery in Half an Hour: NIST Curve Seeds Came From a 1997 Clock
  6. Oct 18OpenCode Hit by "Distillation Attack": API Keys of About 1.4% of Users Compromised
Ask the cat