Anthropic Gives Third-Party Evaluator METR Employee-Level Access to Its Models
Anthropic announced on October 15 that it is granting a team from nonprofit AI evaluator METR employee-level access to its systems, allowing METR to independently assess its advanced models, safety practices, and risk management — and to publish the results independently.

What happened
Reuters reported on October 15 that Anthropic said on Thursday it has granted a team from nonprofit AI evaluator METR employee-level access to its systems, allowing the group to independently assess its advanced models, safety practices, and risk management.
Six METR employees have been provided company hardware, office space, and access to internal tools and systems broadly comparable to those available to Anthropic's own risk assessment teams, the company said.
METR will be able to publish independent assessments of risks, incidents, and safety practices without Anthropic's prior approval, subject only to limited redactions covering customer data, privileged information, and certain model architecture details.
The announcement follows concerns among researchers and evaluators that leading AI labs could wield too much influence over independent reviews through publication restrictions and control over access to sensitive information, Reuters reported.
Key facts
- Access scope: Six METR employees receive company hardware, office space, and internal tools and systems broadly comparable to Anthropic's own risk assessment teams
- Evaluation scope: METR can independently assess Anthropic's advanced models, safety practices, and risk management
- Independent publication: METR may publish assessments of risks, incidents, and safety practices without prior approval; only limited redactions apply for customer data, privileged information, and certain model architecture details
- Context: The move responds to researchers' concerns that leading labs could shape independent reviews through publication restrictions and control of sensitive-information access
Why it matters
A leading AI lab is for the first time letting an outside evaluator assess independently at internal-team-level access and publish independently — third-party evaluation moves from invited testing toward standing independent review.
CompaniesAnthropic
Comments
Related
- Oct 4Former OpenAI Safety Staffer Explains Resignation: "The Time for Trial and Error Is Over"
- Oct 17Anthropic Quietly Lobbied Congress With Its Own Draft AI Safety Bill, Politico Reports
- Oct 17Anthropic Quietly Pitched Congress on Its Own Draft AI Safety Bill
- Oct 15US FTC Issues Civil Subpoenas to OpenAI and Anthropic: AI Safety Probe Escalates
- Oct 14UK Parliament AI Safety Hearing: OpenAI and Anthropic Call for Binding Rules as Google and Meta Decline
Today
Oct 19 Monday- Brief
- GitHubGitHub Weekly Vol.1: 8 Projects Worth Your Time
Tested or read — weeklyAll →
- Quiz
- Call
Latest news
All →- Oct 19Meta Muse Spark Open Review: 816B Open Weights, Leading Agent Tool Use
- Oct 19MONST3R-AI Crimeware Runs Autonomous Pentest Scans on Stolen API Keys, Victims Foot the Bill
- Oct 19VoiceStudio Hits No. 3 on GitHub Daily Trending: Open-Source, Fully Local ElevenLabs Alternative
- Oct 19dsh Free-Model Plugin Hits No. 2 on GitHub Daily Trending: Frontier Models Without Login or API Key
- Oct 18Anthropic to Commit 5% of Shares to New Public Benefit Fund
- Oct 19Stably AI's Orca Tops GitHub Daily Trending: One Desktop App to Orchestrate 30+ Coding Agents
™