Linux Kernel Moves to Drop AI Code Disclosure Tag; Torvalds: Banning AI Tools Is an Utterly Stupid Idea
The Linux Maintainers Summit in Prague reached consensus on Oct 8 to deprecate the Assisted-by tag that required code contributors to disclose AI assistance; kernel developer and Nvidia engineer Sasha Levin then posted to the mailing list proposing the documentation requiring it be removed. On Oct 13, Torvalds fired back on the mailing list at calls to keep some form of disclosure mechanism.

What happened
Sasha Levin wrote in a post to the Linux kernel mailing list: "The Maintainers Summit reached consensus to deprecate the Assisted-by Tag. Remove the documentation requiring it." The tag had required anyone submitting patches with "any sort of advanced coding tool" to add an Assisted-by: LLM [TOOL1] [TOOL2] trailer to the commit message.
Laurent Pinchart, kernel developer and founder of Ideas on Board, objected in an Oct 13 reply: "I'm not happy removing the tag without adding another mechanism for required disclosure." He argued that setting expectations has value even if some contributors ignore it.
"I don't understand this whole idiotic concept of 'don't use AI for X.'"
— Linus Torvalds (Linux kernel mailing list, Oct 13)
Torvalds added sarcastically that Pinchart should get a new rule of his own: no compilers for kernel submissions, hand-written assembly to prove he understands what the machine does — and no text editor for commit messages either. He wrote: "Do you not see how UTTERLY STUPID those kinds of rules would be? So no. We're not going to make stupid rules that say 'you can't use tools for X.'" He said his expectation of contributors is that they do their best and understand what they are doing — "and that understanding has very little to do with what tools they use."
Key facts
- Tag history: Took shape in July 2025, entered the docs in Jan 2026; required flagging AI assistance on patches made with "any advanced coding tool"
- Compliance data: About one in ten of 18,533 non-merge commits in Linux 7.3 through rc7 carried the tag (per LWN), though actual AI tool use is believed to be far wider
- Rationale: Red Hat kernel developer Jeff Layton: not everyone complies, it is free advertising for proprietary LLM companies, and the point of collecting the data is unclear
- Shift: Veteran maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman, who earlier backed keeping the tag, now supports dropping it; at an August open-source summit he said "LLMs are good enough now"
- Companion change: The proposal also removes the tag's handling in the checkpatch.pl script
Why it matters
the Linux kernel is the first major open-source project to demonstrate, with compliance data (only about one in ten commits tagged), that mandatory AI attribution does not work — review will now judge only whether the submitter understands the code, not which tools were used.
Comments
Related
- Oct 18GitHub Copilot to Remove Three Flagship Models on November 16: Claude Opus 4.8/5 and GPT-5.6 Terra Retired
- Oct 16xtool Tops GitHub Daily Trending: Cross-Platform Xcode Replacement
- Oct 13Vercel's Open-Source Skills Tops GitHub Trending: One Command to Equip AI Coding Assistants
- Oct 10AI Agent Diagram Skill diagram-design Returns to GitHub Trending, Reaching 48K Stars
Today
Oct 19 Monday- Brief
- GitHubGitHub Weekly Vol.1: 8 Projects Worth Your Time
Tested or read — weeklyAll →
- Quiz
- Call
Latest news
All →- Oct 18Anthropic to Commit 5% of Shares to New Public Benefit Fund
- Oct 19Stably AI's Orca Tops GitHub Daily Trending: One Desktop App to Orchestrate 30+ Coding Agents
- Oct 19Jailbroken PS5 Becomes a Local AI Server: Qwen3.8-27B Hits ~20 tok/s, Small Models Top 100
- Oct 19Anthropic Internal Study: Junior Share of Technical Staff Falls to 14%, Meeting Time Up 20%
- Oct 18Claude Cracks 25-Year Cryptography Mystery in Half an Hour: NIST Curve Seeds Came From a 1997 Clock
- Oct 18OpenCode Hit by "Distillation Attack": API Keys of About 1.4% of Users Compromised
™